19.2 C
Nairobi
Thursday, April 25, 2024

Court Stops Kenya Power’s Ksh.22 Billion Electric Meters Tender Process

On

Related stories

Luo Elders Confounded After Francis Ogolla’s Son Sees His Father’s Nakedness During Burial

Bumula MP Jack Wamboka has stirred controversy by criticizing...

Amazon Web Services (AWS) avails free AI skills training to Kenyans

Amazon Web Services has announced the availability of its...

Tech Goes Wild: TECNO redefines smartphone imaging with AI-powered CAMON 30 Series

Innovative technology brand TECNO has launched the new CAMON...

Uber Eats’ launch signals the expansion of digital commerce for Kisumu residents

Uber Eats has today announced its expansion to Kisumu,...

Funniest Things Kenyans Are Doing In the Gym

Going to the gym has become the trendiest thing...

Kenya Power has been barred from proceeding with a Ksh.22 billion tender for the supply of meters, pending the determination of a petition challenging the process leading to the award of the tender.

“The leave so granted do operate as a stay of implementation of any decision arising from the notification of intention to award dated 2nd May 2023 including but not limited to actual tender award, signing of procurement contract, execution and/or performance of procurement contract…,” the judge said.

Justice John Chigiti also certified the matter as urgent and directed Kenya Power not to sign the contracts with the winning bidders.

Benedict Kabugi Ndung’u moved to court to challenge the tender.

 Kabugi argues that the tender’s eligibility criteria was watered down to include local assemblers of meters and not manufacturers as earlier advertised, through six addenda, a fact that changed the substance of the original tender document.

The tender was advertised in February for supply of meters by local manufacturers only. Four local companies were issued with notifications including Inhemeter Africa Company Ltd, Smart Meter Technology Ltd, Yocan Group Ltd and Magnate Ventures Ltd.

But Mr Kabugi says the entire process leading to the award were marred with procedural and substantive irregularities including breach of several sections of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

He says mandatory terms on conditions for tender and eligibility were substantially and irregularly altered to defeat the need for competitive bidding.

The judge directed the matter to be mentioned on June 28 for directions.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

Leave a Reply