19.2 C
Nairobi
Thursday, April 25, 2024

White Widow Of Maralal Disappears Mysteriously

On

Related stories

Luo Elders Confounded After Francis Ogolla’s Son Sees His Father’s Nakedness During Burial

Bumula MP Jack Wamboka has stirred controversy by criticizing...

Amazon Web Services (AWS) avails free AI skills training to Kenyans

Amazon Web Services has announced the availability of its...

Tech Goes Wild: TECNO redefines smartphone imaging with AI-powered CAMON 30 Series

Innovative technology brand TECNO has launched the new CAMON...

Uber Eats’ launch signals the expansion of digital commerce for Kisumu residents

Uber Eats has today announced its expansion to Kisumu,...

For some time, Dysseleer Mireille had it all in life. She was beautiful, had money and in a lanky Samburu dancer, she had love.

Then it all crumbled. Now she is missing.

Two husbands later, detectives from Nakuru are working to unravel the disappearance of the 61-year-old Belgian widow who migrated to Kenya and settled in Maralal but has not been seen for the last five months.

Her friends in Maralal believe Mireille left the country after 27 years of calling Kenya her home. A home that gifted her a husband, Emmanuel Lesoipa, who later died.

Dancing husband

They believe she had fallen out of love with Kenya when her Samburu dancing husband married two other wives, triggering a marital fallout and a series of court battles.

Now, DCI investigators believe there could be foul play in her vanishing.

For the past 14 years, Mireille has been embroiled in a vicious court battle with her former husband over the matrimonial property after their marriage collapsed in 2004.

In 1993, she had packed her bags and set off from the country of her birth – Belgium – to the Kenyan coastal town of Malindi where she met the lanky Samburu man that would change her life. She was 35 then.

That was 27 years ago. Now, detectives are trying to unravel the mystery that is the disappearance of the Belgian-Kenyan woman who had become a sensation in Maralal.

For her love for Kenya, Mireille went to the lengths of denouncing her Belgian citizenship. In a 2013 TV interview, she declared she had denounced her citizenship.

Dysseleer Mireille in an undated picture posted on her Facebook account

By her own admission in a television interview carried in 2013 by Citizen TV, she was not taken so much by Lesoipa as by the primal life he led. Lesoipa passed himself off as a Maasai dancer and entertained guests in Malindi.

“After I left Malindi, I kept in contact with him and told him I wanted to visit his home,” she said in the interview.

Mireille visited the Lesoipa’s manyatta in Samburu about eight times over a two year period. Love blossomed between them and they got married.

The couple formalized their union in a civil ceremony in December 1995 and were happy for nine years before the marriage became turbulent and ended in divorce in 2004.

Their union did not have any children and the marriage disintegrated after Lesoipa took a second wife, Naserian Lesoipa.

Mireille was a linguist who spoke her English, Samburu and Swahili fluently albeit with a heavy French accent. The only thing she loved more than life in Maralal and interacting with locals at her cyber café is the pet parrots she kept.

Police believe her disappearance could be linked to a fight over property between her and the family of her estranged husband.

Since their divorce in 2004, Mireille and Lesoipa had been battling in court over their matrimonial property which comprised a townhouse, a shopping complex estimated to be worth Sh19 million as well as a luxury car and a lorry.

The building was sold in an auction in 2017. [Photo: Michael Saitoti]

Shared property

Part of the conditions to dissolving their union was that none of the properties they had purchased could be sold by either of the parties without the other’s consent.

In the event that the properties were sold, Mireille was to receive the initial capital she invested and the profits then shared between them equally, the court also ruled.

But towards the end of 2017 after the death of her ex-husband, Mireille sold the shopping complex in Maralal and relocated to Nakuru, where she bought a house at Milimani estate.

It is from this house in Nakuru that she disappeared in December. According to investigators, the last time Mireille communicated with relatives back home was five months ago through a phone call. The last posting on her Facebook page was on October 6 last year.

Saturday Standard has established that detectives have been to a crematorium they suspect the woman’s body was disposed of.

Other teams are combing houses in Nakuru.

A relative had filed a report with the Belgium Embassy in Nairobi after failing to trace her. The embassy contacted the DCI where a formal report of missing persons was filed. It is on the basis of this report that detectives started looking for Mireille who they now suspect could have been harmed.

Police believe that the Nakuru house could hold the answers to her whereabouts.

The shopping complex in Maralal whose ownership is in dispute [Photo: Michael Saitoti]

Lesoipa’s family had gone to court arguing that the Law of Succession recognizes the rights of wives and children over their husband’s or father’s estate.

“These rights accrue upon the death of the husband. It is urged that the public auction conducted on October 30, 2017, after the death of the deceased was illegal, irregular, null and void,” the court heard

They were opposing a judgment dated February 9, 2015, delivered by Justice Janet Mulwa in Nakuru, who directed that the Samburu property be sold or parties buy each other’s entitlement to it.

The plot was sold by private treaty to Nuclear Investments Ltd for Sh15 million.

But after the purchase, Lesoipa’s relatives went to court seeking that the auction to be nullified.

In his judgment delivered on July 31, 2018, High Court judge AK Ndung’u said: “I am satisfied that the sale by public auction herein was regular and done in accordance with the terms settled by the court. The applicant paid all the necessary monies and indeed, the plaintiff/decree Holder has not contested the fact that her advocates received the decretal sum.”

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

Leave a Reply